South Korea, North Korea, Korean War. UN, USA, Putin, Invasion of Ukraine, the best and worst of this century
(Google translation of https://pef1mm.blogspot.com/2025/01/coreia-do-sul-coreia-do-norte-guerra-da.html, original in Portuguese. I appreciate corrections in the comments. I offer 100% of my royalties to anyone who wants to translate the best of this blog and my 3 eBooks into English, Korean and other languages: https://www.amazon.com.br/stores/Amar1mm1-ANÓNIMO-missionário-apóstolo-revolucionário-para-um-mundo-melhor-nº1/author/B0CB4VWPXD?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0PgNdCiISs9f4VJg2AFGnjiZWbznjTybLhyJXPr1oLWhmAGFp-E9zU83I_aem_P2P5gfH-ODvxMDO0TbvS5Q&ref=ap_rdr&isDramIntegrated=true&shoppingPortalEnabled=true.
You can translate with Google, correct the best, put it in the comments and share it by all means. You can be Amar1mm2 volunteer #2 for a better world: Amar1mm1=ANONYMOUS revolutionary missionary apostle for a better world #1. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/amar1mm.)
Putin and the Putinists who support him in invading Ukraine are, to me, the worst of this century. Whoever defends Ukraine, defends the world from successive invasions by the most barbaric neo-Nazi imperialists.
I imagine few in South Korea don't feel better about North Korea. I imagine that most are grateful to the US and UN for having prevented unification with the invasion of North Korea helped by Russia and China.
Wouldn't it be a form of ethics and fair gratitude today to collaborate with the USA and a more civil and democratic world in the defense of Ukraine? Isn't this a way to protect themselves from Putin's threatening alliance with South Korea? I think the UN needs a Reform to be able to stop all the wars of the invaders as it did in the Korean War. If a force of the best in the world organized by the UN forced Putin to restore the conquered borders and pay for the damages, it would be the best for future peace.
I imagine that South Korea's multi-million dollar contracts for the modernization of its weapons are a consequence of North Korea's increasingly aggressive and threatening policy, now reinforced by the collaboration agreement with Putin. Can't Ukraine's defense be a means of indirectly defending South Korea from North Korean threats?
I remember the information about some balloons with garbage sent from North Korea to South Korea. Was it a provocation? Have there been others?
Since Ukraine urgently needs means of defense, it would not be a good self-defense policy to offer Ukraine the least modern material but which could help the people of Ukraine defend themselves from the criminal Putin and his accomplices, such as the imperialist North Korea? Have there been any arms or other forms of support from South Korea to help Ukraine defend itself?
More with AI=Artificial Intelligence as copilot. I imagine few in South Korea don't feel better about North Korea. I imagine most are grateful to the US for preventing unification by invading North Korea. What was the Korean War like before and after US intervention? The Korean War was a significant conflict that occurred between 1950 and 1953, involving North Korea and South Korea, with the intervention of several international powers. Before US Intervention Outbreak of the Conflict: The war began on June 25, 1950, when North Korea, supported by the Soviet Union and China, invaded South Korea. Initial advance: North Korean forces quickly advanced south, capturing the South Korean capital Seoul and pushing South Korean forces back to a small area in the southeast of the peninsula. US and UN intervention International Response: In response to the invasion, the United Nations, led by the United States, decided to intervene to support South Korea. Troops from several countries were sent under the UN flag. Counterattack: UN forces under General Douglas MacArthur launched a successful counterattack, landing at Incheon and recapturing Seoul. UN forces then advanced north, coming close to the Chinese border. After the US Intervention Chinese Intervention: In response to advancing UN forces, China entered the war in support of North Korea, launching a series of counterattacks that pushed UN forces back south. Stalemate and Armistice: The war eventually stabilized around the 38th parallel, where a static front line formed. On July 27, 1953, an armistice was signed, establishing a demilitarized zone (DMZ) that still divides the two Koreas. US and UN intervention was crucial in preventing the unification of the peninsula under communist North Korea and restoring South Korea's independence. The war had a lasting impact on the region's geopolitics and international relations during the Cold War. If you need more details or have any other questions, I'm here to help! Why don't the UN and the USA act today in Ukraine to counter the most criminal invasion of this century? Or was there any other invasion worse than this one by a stronger nation against a weaker but richer one, to rob it? Russia's invasion of Ukraine is undoubtedly one of the most serious and devastating of this century. The UN and the US have taken several steps to try to resolve the conflict and support Ukraine. The UN General Assembly adopted resolutions demanding the immediate withdrawal of Russian forces and calling for a ceasefire. In addition, the US and other countries have provided military and humanitarian support to Ukraine, as well as imposing severe economic sanctions on Russia2. Comparing invasions is tricky, but the 2003 US invasion of Iraq was also highly controversial and had devastating consequences for the region. Every conflict has its own complexities and impacts, but the human suffering and destruction are always tragic. If you need more information or want to discuss another topic, I'm here to help. The 2003 US invasion of Iraq was also highly controversial and had devastating consequences for the region. Undoubtedly. But it was more of an emotional than an intelligent response to the shock of the Islamic terrorists, of which Saddam Hussein was the main financier. Wasn't the worst mistake of the American invasion the early withdrawal before helping to create a democratic government instead of one subject to Islamic terrorism? The 2003 invasion of Iraq was, in fact, a complex and multifaceted response to the events of September 11, 2001. The Bush administration justified the invasion on the grounds that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam Hussein was linked to Islamic terrorism. However, these claims were widely disputed and subsequently discredited. Consequences of the Invasion Collapse of Saddam Hussein's Regime: The invasion led to the rapid fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, but also created a power vacuum that was filled by various insurgent factions and terrorist groups. Extended Instability: The lack of a clear plan for the reconstruction and stabilization of Iraq resulted in years of sectarian violence and insurgency, which continue to affect the country to this day. Premature Withdrawal: Many analysts argue that the withdrawal of US troops in 2011, before ensuring political stability and security, contributed to the rise of extremist groups such as ISIS. The invasion of Iraq is an example of how military interventions can have unforeseen and long-term consequences. Creating a democratic and stable government is a complex process that requires time, resources and a deep understanding of local dynamics. : Wikipedia : BBC : History of the World
Comentários